Location analytics is often used narrowly for attribution. However, it can and should be employed more extensively for audience and competitive revelations. A great illustration of this comes from Viant, a people-based advertising technology company, which use site data, allegiance card and transaction data and machine learning to understand the affinities and behavior of fast-food customers and group them into distinct sub-segments for more personalized targeting.

Five million customer visits investigated

Partnering with an unnamed place intelligence corporation, Viant analyzed practically 5 million client visits from nearly two million people over the course of six months in 2018. The patron was ” a mid-size national sandwich shop chain with more than 1,000 franchise restaurants .”

The variables examined included restaurant visitation frequency, dinners acquired, and spend- among other factors. The learn likewise tracked the cohorts’ most-watched TV programs, retail affinities and pay a visit to competitors’ fast-foot spots. Applying machine learning, Viant identified five key customer segments, which were sometimes overlapping but had distinct preferences and actions 😛 TAGEND

Breakfast Buyers Lunchtime Loyalists Primetime Patrons Weekenders Devoted Diners

While this kind of persona work( and alliteration) isn’t brand-new, using spot data to build the personas and blending it with a host of other knowledge captured from real-world activities and transactions offers a much richer and more precise view of the customer base. It also offers a brand-new variety of lenses through which to look at customers.

Mostly distinct audience segments

There’s a predisposition to segment fast-food audiences by age, ethnicity or gender. Nonetheless, this example is more complicated and incorporates layers of patron behavior.

Breakfast customers were found to be” most enthusiastic for the dealership than most” and most likely to drive an SUV. Papa Johns was found to be the top vie QSR brand on a roll of six. These men shop more at Nordstrom, Target, Walmart and Amazon compared with the national average. According to the data, their top Tv appearance was NCAA football.

Lunchtime Loyalists watch Fixer Upper, shop at Nordstrom and visit Chick-Fil-A when they’re not eating at the client restaurant. They likewise inspect Starbucks and booze Coke much more than the national average. Primetime Patrons are more likely to be beer alcoholics, eat at the Olive Garden, watch ESPN and get gas from a Shell-branded station.

So-called Weekenders were found to be loyal to a single eatery location,” most likely near their place of residence .” Panera is the go-to competitive chain. They expend less than the national average on Amazon and, like Breakfast Buyers, NCAA football is their top “show.” They also spend roughly $56 per quarter at McDonald’s.

Finally, Devoted Diners are devotees of The Voice and expend $67 per quarter at Papa John’s. Most importantly they were the highest frequency customers,” who inspect more than any other group” and patronize multiple franchise sites in a passed month. They likewise inspect irrespective of time of day or day of week.

House more personalized campaigns

One of the most interesting parts of the study, which is not fully uncovered, explains how different channels work better for different audience segments. For lesson, desktop ads were 2x more likely to influence Breakfast Buyers than mobile. Lunchtime Loyalists also were more responsive to desktop campaigns. Primetime Patrons responded most to CTV advertising:” They are 40% more likely to visit after seeing a CTV ad than a mobile ad .” Desktop video worked best with Weekenders. However, mobile ads were most effective with the ultra-loyalist Devoted Diners.

With this knowledge, Viant and its customer can take aim at the different segments with specific, more personalized, campaigns and ad creative. The company might want to address the group with the weakest loyalty or frequency is whether that behavior are subject to change. It can also experiment a conquesting campaign with a specific segment and then expand that to additional audiences if successful.

But the primary importance in all this, arguably, is that location revelations can build a more complete understanding of the customer. And the distinction between location intelligence and survey data is that you’re getting actual behavior rather than sentiments and remembers, which may be imprecise or otherwise faulty.

Indeed, this case demonstrates the full versatility and importance of location intelligence in the modern customer journey, which is overwhelmingly online-to-offline.

The post Study of 5 million fast-food inspects divulges customer segments, channel effectiveness seemed first on Marketing Land.

Read more: marketingland.com